Re: NO queries in QGPL please!!

[Paul <kdcma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Neil Palmer wrote:

> So they store queries in QGPL, I could ask "so what ?".  Admittedly it
> may be easier to manage if they were placed in a separate library, but
> the fact they are in QGPL isn't really going to cause any problems,
> release upgrades or otherwise.  IBM doesn't mess with user objects in
> QGPL during release updates.

Neil,

I'm not at all concerned about future OS upgrades, rather, system upgrades. I
just went from CISC to RISC and I went through a bit of hastle to get the QGPL
queries into my new system. It was a NEW BOX, so I restored from tape, library 
by
library to get the users queries up. Had I done that with QGPL, I would have had
"hilarious consequences" as portions of the old CISC OS overwrote members from
the new V4R2 RISC OS. That would suck!!

Paul

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---