RE: Ending job has priority 16!?! -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

From:   Walden Leverich [SMTP:walden@techsoftinc.com]

> This is the result of the new dynamic priority manager in V4R1....

I forgot to mention that the machine is currently running V3R6.

AND: QDynPtyScd=0=off!

> Having said that, I'm surprised that the priority was increased for an ending 
>job, 
> after all if an ending job is not ending fast enough who cares?.
> Unless:
> Are you using commitment control? ...

Yes. And it seems to be a rather DB intensive job. Good guess!

Looks as if the system does more dynamic priority adjustments
than we would expect.

Regards,
Rudi

application/ms-tnef

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.