|
I guess I shouldn't be surprised about the reaction to my simple question. but I am. Performance tuning is a very touchy issue. It's kept me employed for quite a while, but I always feel edgy about whether I could be doing a better job for my clients. I would guess from the reactions I've seen here that there is no consensus on what constitutes that better job. [Yes, I know the reaction: if the clients aren't complaining.....] Hank Heath In a message dated 98-01-10 17:04:43 EST, pmassiello@os-solutions.com (Pete Massiello) wrote: << Performance tuning using the QPFRADJ for most sites is probably better than doing a coin toss to determine what the value for activity levels, pool sizes, priority, and other work management values should be. >> +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.