At 08:30 AM 12/15/97 -0600, you wrote:
>Sure, you'll save valuable network resources, but the Zip program takes   
>SO MUCH of the 400 while zipping that it is actually worse!  And it takes   
>long!  QBATCH wouldn't be any better.  I was doing these interactivaly.
>We also have many 400s and we were looking into this as a valuable option   
>to sending tapes or files over the network.  Well, PKZip hasn't convinced   
>us yet.

How do have your SAVxxx commands set? There's a parameter that does
compression on the fly—DTACPR(*YES). I got a reduction of about 2/3's in a
couple cases.

It's native, but not the default.


Vernon Hamberg
Systems Software Programmer
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
400 Second Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55401
(612) 371-1111 x480

| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].