|
Brad At 08:30 AM 12/15/97 -0600, you wrote: >Sure, you'll save valuable network resources, but the Zip program takes >SO MUCH of the 400 while zipping that it is actually worse! And it takes >long! QBATCH wouldn't be any better. I was doing these interactivaly. > >We also have many 400s and we were looking into this as a valuable option >to sending tapes or files over the network. Well, PKZip hasn't convinced >us yet. How do have your SAVxxx commands set? There's a parameter that does compression on the fly—DTACPR(*YES). I got a reduction of about 2/3's in a couple cases. It's native, but not the default. Cheers Vernon Hamberg Systems Software Programmer Old Republic National Title Insurance Company 400 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55401 (612) 371-1111 x480 +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
