× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: TCP/IP & CAw95 configuration troubles
  • From: "Guillermo Andrades [CPI]" <gab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 16:28:19 +0100

To: Christian Zander 
Chris, 
Thanks for your comparation. I've changed the UDPCKS to *NO, but
TCP/IP maintain the negative to ping to any PC.

Please any other thing?
(all the text in the previous message with subject "TCP/IP & CAw95
configuration troubles")

Thanks.



----------
From: Christian Zander <100070.2407@compuserve.com>
To: Blind.Copy.Receiver@compuserve.com
Subject: TCP/IP & CAw95 configuration troubles
Date: 8 de diciembre de 1997 10:11

Hello Guillermo,

I have compared your configuration with my own one. I have found only
two
differences.

1. CFGTCP option 12 (local domain)
you wrote
CPI1.DOMINIO400...
CPI1
I assume it hat to read as 
DOMINIO400.CPI.COM (this is the domain name)
CPI1 (this is the host name)

But this might not be a problem.

2. CFGTCP option 3 (Attributes)
You wrote:
 TCPKEEPALV     120             
 TCPURGPTR      *BSD            
 TCPRCVBUF      8192            
 TCPSNDBUF      8192            
 UDPCKS         *YES            
 IPDTGFWD       *NO             
 IPRSBTIMO      120             
 IPTTL          64              
 ARPTIMO        5               
 LOGPCLERR      *NO             

I have:
 TCPKEEPALV     120             
 TCPURGPTR      *BSD            
 TCPRCVBUF      8192            
 TCPSNDBUF      8192            
 UDPCKS         *NO            
 IPDTGFWD       *NO             
 IPRSBTIMO      120             
 IPTTL          64              
 ARPTIMO        120               
 LOGPCLERR      *NO

I'm pretty sure that UPDCKS(*YES) is not compatible with
Win95-TCP/IP. But
since I'm not a TCP/IP guru this is only an assumption. I have it at
*NO
and my configuration works. The time-out is longer at my location,
but this
must not be a problem either.

I hope this was a little bit helpful.

Adios

Chris
calling from Kassel, Germany

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.