Offhand observation about the CA/NT Router Question

["Joe Hertvik" <jhertvik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Has anyone noticed that the CA/NT abbreviation we're all using to
describe Client Access running under Windows NT looks suspiciously
like the word CAN'T? Just a random observation....

----------
> From: mcrump@ballfoster.com
> To: Midrange-l@midrange.com
> Subject: CA/NT Router Question
> Date: Tuesday, November 18, 1997 12:49 PM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I apologize upfront for not having investigated
> more but I seem to have a possible problem
> with the design with CA/NT, especially the router.
> 
> In WIN31 I could define multiple AS/400's to a
> router and to a SAP.  In NT it seems that I have
> to either create a seperate router for each system
> (which requires a unique SAP at the client) or use
> APPN routing.
> 
> This seems like a big step back for sites that have
> multiple AS/400's.  Am I missing somthing?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to
"MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MAJORDOMO@midrange.com
> |    and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your
message.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> +---


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com
|    and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---