|
John Carr wrote: > Message text written by INTERNET:MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > > >BTW, my 10 year old Sys/38 program that was 16? bits, became 32 on the > 400, and is now RISC-64, >what are the advantages really to more bits, > except that it runs faster, and isn't that mostly because the >processors > are faster? > > Uhhh, actually the SYS/38 was always 48bit addressing (as well as the > first AS/400's) > Both always(Since '78) have 128bit system pointers. Yeah, that's why I said 16?. I never really coded on the Sys/38, I was only about 16 (early 80's?) when it came out. I was an operator (of sorts) during my summers. I also worked with a Series/1, many Sys/34's, and a shiny new Sys/36. -- Art Tostaine, Jr. Creative Computer Associates, Inc. Parlin, NJ atostaine_at_crecomp_dot_com +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com | and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.