|
>I have heard nothing to support this, so I was surprised when a customer >said to me today that he was told by another vendor that there was some >problem with the 8 gig drives. > >Anybody hear anything about that? The only thing I could think of was that >retrieval from 1 8 gig might be slower than from 2 4 gigs because of less >heads reading. Is this just someone blowing smoke? Maybe looking to "be an >expert" or sell some 4 gig drives? > >Chris Rehm We haven't heard about any problems, but, like you, the 8 Gig drives mean fewer arms. We're staying with the 4 Gig drives during our upcoming conversion. One of the configuration parameters for our new box recommends a minimum number of arms; the 8 Gig drives wouldn't have let us with enough arms. --Paul E Musselman PaulMmn@ix.netcom.com +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com | and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.