>I have heard nothing to support this, so I was surprised when a customer
>said to me today that he was told by another vendor that there was some
>problem with the 8 gig drives.
>
>Anybody hear anything about that? The only thing I could think of was that
>retrieval from 1 8 gig might be slower than from 2 4 gigs because of less
>heads reading. Is this just someone blowing smoke? Maybe looking to "be an
>expert" or sell some 4 gig drives?
>
>Chris Rehm



We haven't heard about any problems, but, like you, the 8 Gig drives mean
fewer arms.  We're staying with the 4 Gig drives during our upcoming
conversion.  One of the configuration parameters for our new box recommends
a minimum number of arms; the 8 Gig drives wouldn't have let us with enough
arms.

--Paul E Musselman

PaulMmn@ix.netcom.com


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com
|    and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2020 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].