Re: client access still not work...

Bob,

In a message dated 97-09-04 16:37:37 EDT, you write:

> With COMMON around the corner and all this CA/400 talk going on (about it 
>  not working in this or that area) I'm beginning to wonder if I need to 
>  restate my serious comments about CA/400. At the conference in Boston (it 
>  was Boston wasn't it?) I said a few words about the wonders of Client 
>  Access for Win95, and what IBM should do with it. For those of you that 
>  heard that comment, do you feel it's still appropriate?
>  
>  Bob Cozzi
>  PS. I got in a lot of trouble for it "Bob you're a high-profile guy. You 
>  can't say stuff like that." said one IBMer. ...that's like throwing gas on

>  a fire. <g>

I haven't had a GOOD thing to say about CA in years.  If a "high profile guy"
doesn't either, maybe they'll start listening!  If they ask why you'd say
something like that, say "Cozzi felt it was the truth".

Regards,

Dean Asmussen
Enterprise Systems Consulting, Inc.
Fuquay-Varina, NC  USA
E-Mail:  DAsmussen@AOL.COM

"Be like a postage stamp -- stick to one thing until you get there." --
Margaret Carty
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com
|    and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---