• Subject: client access still not work...
  • From: Bob Cozzi <BobCozzi@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 09:57:29 -0500


With COMMON around the corner and all this CA/400 talk going on (about it 
not working in this or that area) I'm beginning to wonder if I need to 
restate my serious comments about CA/400. At the conference in Boston (it 
was Boston wasn't it?) I said a few words about the wonders of Client 
Access for Win95, and what IBM should do with it. For those of you that 
heard that comment, do you feel it's still appropriate?

Bob Cozzi
PS. I got in a lot of trouble for it "Bob you're a high-profile guy. You 
can't say stuff like that." said one IBMer. ...that's like throwing gas on 
a fire. <g>

| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com
|    and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com

This thread ...

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2020 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].