Re: ILE review

  From: Tim Lennon on 25/04/97 09:20
  
  On the subject of activation groups and using SETON LR (etc.....):
  1. I remember something useful in a distant News/400, which
  suggested that using the default activation group (*DFTACTGRP) was
  inefficient.
  2. I had a (non-fatal) problem where the CRTPGM command was
  attempting to bind the service programs QSYS/QUSRGFA1 and
  QSYS/QZCACLT, but failed because I had insufficient authority.
  Assist/400 sent this to Rochester, who apparently have logged it as
  a problem but, due to the non-fatal nature, don't envisage a quick
  solution.
  3. I've been closing all the modules within my ILE using RETURN, and
  usually closing the entry module with SETON LR, which I understand
  to be the 'right' way to do things. Does anybody have any different
  opinions?
  4. We're currently using a 320 (CISC, 40Gb array), and having done
  my training on a RISC box, I can't help feeling that you really need
  to move to RISC when using ILE, if only to speed up the development
  cycle somewhat....

  Tim Lennon.
  A/P, Thomas Miller & Co.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* This is the Midrange System Mailing List!  To submit a new message,   *
* send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".  To unsubscribe from     *
* this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify            *
* 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.  Questions      *
* should be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com   *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *