|
Do you know specifics? Quantifiable stuff? Decision points made and changed? from and too info? Why did they decide to change to non-AS/400 in the first place? Why did they come back to the AS/400? Did they have trainwrecks? Were jobs lost? Did heads roll? When they came back to the AS/400 was the recovery fast and smooth? A few tales would be interesting to read; to me at least. In <335BB74E.11A5@ibm.net>, on 04/21/97 at 12:51 PM, Bob Angell <aimsllc@ibm.net> said: > (I have actually seen some companies remove and then >reacquire the AS/400 because the new stuff could not remain reliable, go >figure). -- ----------------------------------------------------------- boothm@earth.goddard.edu ----------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This is the Midrange System Mailing List! To submit a new message, * * send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". To unsubscribe from * * this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify * * 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message. Questions * * should be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
