|
MI>At 10:31 AM 4/14/97 -0500, you wrote: MI>>We use 2Gb 1/4" QIC cartridges for tape backups on a 436. There are MI>>obvious advantages to using higher capacity tapes (5Gb+); am I missing MI>>any disadvantages? (I got burned many years ago attempting to economize MI>>on open reel tapes by using thin, high-capacity media.) I'd appreciate MI>The only disadvantage is that QIC is basically slow. In general, QIC is a MI>pretty good format. My list of disadvantages to the 6380 is as follows: (1) All tapes are sequential media. Now that you have the ability to store more than 1000 files on a tape - and you SHOULD be doing a complete nightly backup - you will find that selecting 60 files and restoring them individually is a chore from Hell. If, God forbid, you use the IBM SAVE ALL, restoring these 60 files will be even more time-consuming, since the logical method to do this is to sort the files into the tape VTOC order before you start. It makes you wish that IBM had created a 2.5Gb diskette (like the PC folks are doing). Mein Gott... why oh why are we wishing we had something the PC community already has? (2) The Advanced 36 series has a standard tape drive (6380?) that is not backwards-compatible with the 6157. You can read a 6157 tape, but the old model System/36s can't read any format you can write with a 6380. I still have customers with 5360 and 5362, and they SHOULD buy an AS/436, but it's a shame that *I* have to suffer too. (Does anyone know about the FTS 225 tape drive?) (3) The 2.5Gb tape is expensive to buy, and (unless you have the Large package or are using OS/400 with an SSP guest) you don't have enough disk space to fill up a 2.5 Gb tape. It would seem that a slightly less-expensive tape with a smaller capacity would be a better deal. On balance, I love the 6380 drive. Finally, my customers have a tape backup solution that meets 100% of their needs, even though my needs are not addressed. My 24-hour shops are not disturbed by their complete nightly backups. Also, once the tape is inserted and the system identifies it, there are no additional 6-minute task waits before SSP can use the same tape for a new job (as was with the 6157). Too bad that I need a AS/36 for its tape save/restore function alone at my home office. Ten thousand bucks is a lot harder for me to pay for my 1 user than it is for the customers and their 20 users.... I wanna laptop! jgm@nak.com "36 And Beyond! - We Never Gripe!" * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This is the Midrange System Mailing List! To submit a new message, * * send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". To unsubscribe from * * this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify * * 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message. Questions * * should be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.