× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




On 10-Dec-07, at 1:00 PM, James Lampert wrote:

My predecessors had already done
much to both optimize it and make it more readable, but I still ended up
spending over a year going through it, one subroutine at a time, to
optimize it for space, speed, and maintainability.

This got me thinking. Has anyone here done any tests to compare the execution speed of MI programs vs comparable C programs? IBM doesn't write in MI any more and by sticking with MI you lose most of the optimization options that are available to ILE programs. The vast majority of MI instructions are surfaced in the C compiler and if I recall correctly are not called as functions (as they would be if called from RPG) but replaced by in-line code streams which should be a lot more efficient.

C code has to be a lot more maintainable than MI and there are many more tools to work with it.

SO is there really any reason to use MI for new code? Does it really perform any better?

Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.