Re: Weird behavior of CMPBLA -- MI400

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Weird behavior of CMPBLA
From: Keith Carpenter <carpcon@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:58:37 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/mi400>
List-help: <mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries <mi400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:mi400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mi400>, <mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mi400>, <mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

James H. H. Lampert wrote:

Has anybody ever heard of a CMPBLA(B) somehow following a
NEQ branch even though the fields being compared were
demonstrably equal (and indeed, another CMPBLA(B) on those
fields followed an EQ branch?

Can you create a reproducible example ?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Weird behavior of CMPBLA , James H. H. Lampert

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.