Re: V5R4 and patch programs

and running the program  I posted the other day over the go faster library:

DATE:  2/01/06                        List System State Programs
Page:     1

Program     Library     Release      State-Domain-Obsv-Attrib
Owner      Text
GOFSTP1     FASTERI53   V4R4M0        S     U      N
QDFTOWN    GoFaster Pgm1
GOFSTP2     FASTERI53   V4R4M0        S     U      N
QDFTOWN    GoFaster Pgm2
RDR0155     FASTERI53   V3R7M0        S     U      N
QSECOFR
RVCLNUP     FASTERI53   V3R6M0        S     U      N
QSECOFR    Remote-View - cleanup errors
RVGET       FASTERI53   V3R6M0        S     U      N
QSECOFR    Remote-View - copy screen image
RVMAIN      FASTERI53   V3R7M0        S     U      N
QSECOFR    Remote-View - main program
RVPROC      FASTERI53   V3R6M0        S     U      N
QSECOFR    Remote-View - do processing
RVSETUP     FASTERI53   V3R6M0        S     U      N
QSECOFR    Remote-View - install
WRKSYSACC   FASTERI53   V3R7M0        S     U      N
QSECOFR    Work with System Activity II - cleanup errors
WRKSYSACM   FASTERI53   V3R6M0        S     U      N
QSECOFR    Work with System Activity II - main process
Total Programs..........                  10


It looks like none of these will run at v5r4 (as I understand the new
"rules")

the fast400 program does not show as a system state program.

_____________________________
Bryan Dietz
Aktion Associates


mi400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/01/2006 07:09:42 AM:

> Not necc true.  You do not "have" to be system state to go "into" system
> state.  A program can move in and out at will.  So you could never see
that
> without the proper tools which would be terribly difficult unless you
work
> for IBM but maybe....  Which brings up the claim of GO FASTER that states
it
> runs in user state.  Doesn't mean it doesn't go SS at some point.  And
> really if you play with the words I suppose any "Q" program could be
claimed
> to run user state by virtue of you calling it from user state.
>
> The other issue with this is believing that you could access the "magic"
> governor data areas w/o going SS.  Again it's possible, but I doubt IBM
> would stick it there.  Heck you can't even create an index anymore w/o
being
> SS.
>
> I think the FAST/400 attack was a ruse, not the real intent.  But it all
> seems to have worked out for Leif in the end, bad for everyone else.  He
did
> great work for everyone while it lasted. :)
>