× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Only objects visible to OS/400 are in the index. I.E. the various "internal
objects"
that, for instance, makes up a database file are not there.

- Njal



> -----Original Message-----
> From: mi400-bounces+njal.fisketjon=broadpark.no@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:mi400-bounces+njal.fisketjon=broadpark.no@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf
> Of Bob Cozzi
> Sent: 20. mai 2004 14:24
> To: 'MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries'
> Subject: RE: [MI400] MCH3401 removal
>
>
> You stumped me on this one... I don't even recall this from back
> in the days
> of S/38 MI programming.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mi400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mi400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Njal Fisketjon
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 4:29 PM
> To: MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries
> Subject: RE: [MI400] MCH3401 removal
>
> Bob,
>
> It might be a bit too "dirty" for your task, but I think that looking up
> the *QDIDX (an index of type x'0E90') in the library is the fastest way
> to check for object existence.
>
>
> - Njal
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mi400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mi400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On
> > Behalf Of Bob Cozzi
> > Sent: 18. mai 2004 17:41
> > To: 'MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries'
> > Subject: RE: [MI400] MCH3401 removal
> >
> >
> > Hi Leif,
> > I agree, however I am not using MI source/syntax, I am use the C
> > language MI
> > functions, and your technique doesn't seem to have a C equivalent.
> > I am concerned about performance because I am processing tens of
> > millions of
> > records and need the job to finish as soon as possible. I have
> > done several
> > things to optimize performance. Originally I was using a CALL to
> > QUSROBJD to
> > check for object existence. By switch to the rslvsp technique, I
> > cut a huge
> > check of overhead out of the routine--in fact most of the
> overhead was in
> > just that one call. So every "bit" helps.
> > -Bob
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries (MI400) mailing list
> To post a message email: MI400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mi400
> or email: MI400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/mi400.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries (MI400) mailing list
> To post a message email: MI400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mi400
> or email: MI400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/mi400.
>
>



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.