> I tried to change (sst) the "Literal pool" of a module but
 > when I try to use ........

Even if you re-create the checksum I'm not convinced you will like the
results.  I'm digging up distant memories here and perhaps Bruce Vining
would be good enough to provide a more definitive answer but .....

If memory serves, one of the differences between OPM and ILE programs is
that literals are pooled to some extent by the compilers and optimizer even
at the "no optimization" level, in ways that were not done with OPM.  Seems
to me that it could well be what appears to be a single constant may in fact
provide the storage for multiple constants.

If you want to internationalize, why not do it the "right" way - IBM thinks
the subject warrants an entire manual - if you haven't already done so I
suggest you take a look.

Jon Paris
Partner400
www.Partner400.com



This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2020 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].