|
> -----Original Message----- > From: John Bottomley [mailto:john.bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > Just what is it that can be done so much better in MI that makes it > > worth dealing with the absence of tools, documentation, > syntax checkers, > > debuggers ..... > > Well, I for one find MI ideal for writing compact code that > runs fat on ALL models of AS/400s. Hehe, 'compact code that runs fat' another one of those self negating sentences I love - albeit due to a typo :-) > And I also find the docs for MI quite > adequate. And as to debuggers, I wish the ILE debugger > were anywhere near as easy to use > on C code as the OPM debugger is on MI. My view is opposite, I prefer the 'ILE' debugger, and never had any issues using it on C/C++ code. There are better tools out there, Tango/04 [ http://www.tango04.com ] has an excellent suite of both Windows based and 5250 based debug tools. --phil
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
