> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Bottomley [mailto:john.bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>  > Just what is it that can be done so much better in MI that makes it
> > worth dealing with the absence of tools, documentation, 
> syntax checkers,
> > debuggers .....
> Well, I for one find MI ideal for writing compact code that 
> runs fat on ALL models of AS/400s. 

Hehe, 'compact code that runs fat' another one of those self negating sentences 
I love - albeit due to a typo :-)

> And I also find the docs for MI quite 
> adequate. And as to debuggers, I wish the ILE debugger 
> were anywhere near as easy to use
> on C code as the OPM debugger is on MI.

My view is opposite, I prefer the 'ILE' debugger, and never had any issues 
using it on C/C++ code. There are better tools out there, Tango/04 [ 
http://www.tango04.com ] has an excellent suite of both Windows based and 5250 
based debug tools.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.