RE: SEPT question -- MI400

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: [MI400] SEPT question
From: "Hall, Philip" <phall@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:16:29 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/mi400>
List-help: <mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries <mi400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:mi400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mi400>,<mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mi400>,<mailto:mi400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcNMfbqhss/IXly4SQuHUcwqTXBDMAAACTng
Thread-topic: [MI400] SEPT question

Changing the master SEPT ? Ouch !

Could you not redirect the SEPT pointer in a job's PCO to a copy, where the 
changes are transient for the life of the job ? More involved, but less risky 
than modifying the system SEPT.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gene_Gaunt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Gene_Gaunt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:39 AM
> Subject: [MI400] SEPT question
>
> Does a change to the SEPT survive an IPL?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.