|
In the past (at S/38 times) we have been told that odd packed numbers were not so efficient as even ones, and that - at design time - it was better to define even packed numbers (for example 9.0 instead of 8.0). The simple anwser could be to use 9.0 because it occupies the same storage as 8.0, but unfotunately it occupies also one more byte in reports, panels, etc. and - with other values - another byte for one more decimal separator. Is there any evidence that with RISC processors this is still true? If so, how much system performances could degrade in case of large files? -- Giuseppe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.