|
yes, he is right on. ----- Original Message ----- From: Chuck Lewis <clewis@iquest.net> > I always loved that example from Bruce ! > I'll close this discussion with these words from Bruce Schneier > (Preface to Applied Cryptography): > > "If I take a letter, lock it in a safe, hide the safe somewhere in > New York, then tell you to read the letter, that's not security. > That's obscurity. On the other hand, if I take a letter and lock it > in a safe, and then give you the safe along with the design > specifications of the safe and a hundred identical safes with > their combinations so that you and the world's best safecrackers > can study the locking mechanism - and you still can't open the > safe and read the letter - that's security." >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.