× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Thanks for the reply, Barbara!

The interesting thing is that, in all my testing, I had called the programs
from the command line, with hardcoded (literal?) parameters.  But you're
saying that the offsets for the parameters are determined by the calling
program's parameters?  I'll have to play around with that a bit.

What about the fields that overlaid the parameter fields?  Did you have any
insight for that?  And the difference in the *Entry parameter offsets
between the two programs?

- Dan Bale
(I am *NOT* "Dale"
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200105/msg00281.html )

bmorris@ca.ibm.com wrote:
<snip>

Dan, I'm not sure you can get the order of the parameters from this
dump.  I think the offsets reflect the location of parameters in the
calling program.  You must be passing parameters in order.  I just
ran a little experiment with the following two programs.  I named
the parameters in reverse alphabetical order in the called program,
and in the calling program, I passed parameters that were
a) in order, b) out of order, c) the same.
<snip>



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.