|
Kaare Plesner wrote: |"if turned on, QPFRADJ may move pages between pools" still does NOT |apply for private pools?? Correct. The automatic performance adjustment features will not change the size of private memory pools. Thanks to you and others for seeking clarification of my overly-general earlier statement on performance adjustment. Leif Svalgaard wrote: |I think the presumption is |that the "bring" can be done many pages at a time. Also true. A single i/o operation can involve many main store pages. Of course, the system database code will attempt to limit i/o operations, too, so one can't assume that manual controls of paging will always reduce i/o operations. Similarly, database algorithms change over time, so one must understand that manual paging control that is helpful at one point may not necessarily be beneficial in the future. Anticipating follow-up questions: :-) I don't think the current maximum i/o numbers are externally published because they are model-dependent and so can change over time, so I don't plan to go into more detail about them here. I recommend the IBM Info Center for more information. For example, see http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/html/as400/v5r1/ic2924/index.htm, in particular the Performance and Work Management sections. Paul Godtland
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.