RE: MI as the MI language of the as400.

>for one: activation groups. To quote Dr. Frank:
>
>"Each process has a PAWA. Within this PAWA is the PAGP
>and two or more ACTGRPs. Each ACTGRP has a PACB
>that contains multiple MBVs, an ActGrp directory, a PRT,
>a heap list, one of more heap spaces, auto storage segments,
>and static storage segments. Now isn't this perfectly clear?"
>
>Even the snide question is Dr. Frank's.
>And in his summary he forgot: tombstone segments, Process
>Queue space, PCB, ...

So is the issue deciphering (and working with in MI) the more complex
control structures or utilising the features of AGs (in any language)?
Interesting thread!
  --buck