|
Dan, > And you want IBM to emulate Microsh*t's example?!?!? Are you > nuts? I'll take iSeries stability over any cr*p M$ ships any > day. OS/400 stability, hmmmm. Just a very simple query of the APAR's shows 250 documents found for 'system crash or hang' Public perception can sometimes be a bad thing. > The only reason M$ is profitable is that it sells patches > as OS upgrades, And OS/400 V1R2M0 through V5R2M0 are not ? OS/400 is good, but I think not that good ! > and it has a very gullible market base that > implicitly allows M$ to set standards. Should IBM > follow that model? I think not. It doesn't need to have a 'very gullible market' it has a better one, a very captive market. --phil
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
