|
From: Larry Loen <lwloen@us.ibm.com> > I was only trying to object to the idea someone expressed that RISC > architecture couldn't do two relevant things in one instruction. No more, > no less. fair enough. It is interesting that all RISC architectures feature "complexity creep" with time. The original premise behind RISC was to ruthlessly remove complexity such that each instruction was as barebones as possible thereby allowing cheap and fast hardware implementation. Complexity should be done in software not in hardware. My point was really that RISC instructions *should* not do more than one thing at a time.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.