Re: [MI400] RE: Job in MSGW

["Carsten Flensburg" <flensburg@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Giuseppe,

That's right, it wouldn't - here's how the manual describes the attribute:
Message reply. Whether the job is waiting for a reply to a specific message.
The field applies only when the active job status or active job status for
job ending is MSGW. Possible values are:

  0
  The job currently is not in message wait status.
  1
  The job is waiting for a reply to a message.
  2
  The job is not waiting for a reply to a message.
I'll email you a sample program privately.

Best regards,
Carsten Flensburg

----- Original Message -----
From: "Giuseppe Costagliola" <gcosta@sidin.it>
To: <mi400@midrange.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:51 PM
Subject: [MI400] RE: Job in MSGW


> If you have pieces of code that you can share it would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> In any case before I start writing new code I would like to be sure that
> both solutions cover this:
>
> pgm1 creates a msgq and submits (with parameter msgq in sbmjob command)
> pgm2a, pgm2b, pgm2c, etc. that run at the same time .
> Then pgm1 waits until pgm2a, b, c etc. finished.
> Pgm1 status is MSGW, but pgm1 MUST NOT be signalled as in error.