|
Thanks for your replies, Gene & Jean-Michel (and all others thus far) >operationally identical comparison between two program objects >seems to me too subjective for quick a program fix Gene, I'm somewhat surprised that you feel this is subjective. Um, and what do you mean by a "program fix"? I'm not "fixing" any apps, just trying to determine if a given source member would reproduce the "operationally identical" object, so that I could know which source member belongs in production. Please educate me. >hold them up to the light, and let a person decide equivalence. How would I even know what to look for? >I think it can be achieve using old-Api QSCMATPG. Jean-Michel's suggestion is intriguing (sp?). Jean-Michel, do you have a working program from which you'd be willing to share the source code? - Dan Bale (I am *NOT* "Dale" http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200105/msg00281.html ) SAMSA, Inc. 989-790-0507 DBale@SAMSA.com <mailto:DBale@SAMSA.com> Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.