|
>> The only 5250 display that supported graphics >> was the 5292m2. IBM didn't sell too many of >> them. Because there aren't many 5250 graphical >> terminals, there aren't too many 5250 >> applications that are graphically enabled. No >> demand. > >All the terminals I see now are pc's running some >form of telnet. It is the telnet software that >is not programmed to support graphics. Right you are, and the reason that there aren't any TN5250 clients that support the graphics orders is that there's no demand for the graphic orders out in the application world. I've only met a mere handful of people who've used GDDM besides myself, and I think there have only been two occasions I can recall in 5+ years that the subject has come up. Each time, it was somebody tinkering; not a production application. If I remember rightly, there's an open source TN5250 project (Mike Madore's name sticks in my head.) Perhaps this is an area where open source would fill the niche need that the IBM Cathedral isn't prepared to fill? --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.