|
>> What is the difference between that and Fast400 from IBM's perspective? I would say the difference is very significant - certainly in a legal sense. One is using documented features of the OS, the other is the result of reverse engineering the OS. Since reverse engineering the OS contravenes the OS/400 license, then for sure the person who wrote the tool (and I suspect those who sell it) are in contravention. Not sure if IBM's license terms make it illegal to utilize such knowledge, but it wouldn't surprise me knowing IBM's lawyers. Seems to me though that all IBM has to do to stop this from working is to add a test or two of this bit to the workstation data management code, and simply error out if the bit is not set. That can't be that hard to do can it? If they take that approach then you are down to patching code to make the thing work again and now you are certainly contravening you OS/400 license. I suspect that IBM will block this but may not do so until after they have taken some action to provide a better pricing model for 5250 use. Jon Paris Partner400
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.