|
On Thu, 18 October 2001, "Joe Pluta" wrote: > If nothing else, this ought to bring fully to light just what CFINT is, no? Probably. IBM's eventual response will almost certainly be an indication. Most especially if there are no significant negative effects of FAST400, e.g., client/server response times do not increase as interactive decreases. <minimally related rant> Personally, although I've heard all the arguments, I still don't see why 5250 is clung to so tightly. Yeah, yeah, "heads-down data entry is so much faster than GUI, yada, yada...", but seriously, how many of us have been working almost exclusively in a GUI environment for the past few years? I know, some don't; but believe it or not, even Client Access workstation emulation is... essentially a GUI window that's been designed to pretend to be green-screen (more or less)! It is not possible to argue that you cannot make a GUI environment as fast, effective, efficient, whatever, as green-screen for any function; it all depends upon how you design your GUI and server applications. </minimally related rant> Tom Liotta -- Tom Liotta The PowerTech Group, Inc. 19426 68th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Phone 253-872-7788 Fax 253-872-7904 http://www.400Security.com ___________________________________________________ The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe Better! Faster! More Powerful! 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now! http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
