|
Leif, I think this is what IBM intends. The midrange community should grab this as a cost savings argument for designing and developing new applications to replace our legacy green screen applications. Instead of continually patching and extending our old applications we need to move to the current/future generation of user interaction (web). We have saved money and time by skipping over the Windows interface, but its time to move on. If we continue to fight for 5250, we have guaranteed the demise of our favorite platform. Regards, Stan >wouldn't that same argument not also apply to Joe Pluta's method of >"re-engineering programs to remove the 5250 I/O" and get the same >interactive capability but without 5250? >Presumably true "interactive" capability is measured in service >given to users interacting directly with the system. The interactive >tax should really be called a 5250 tax.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
