|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Hall, Philip" <phall@spss.com> > > There are TAATOOLS (when they were still free in QUSRTOOL) that broke at > different release levels, unless you recompiled the new source for them that > came with that new release. Although, granted, they never used really > 'undocumented' stuff. Before there were all the system api's, I can see the tool code breaking, but what v5r1 tool would be release dependent and why? > > The system needs PKCS #1 thru 15 as open source api's, > > written in MI for best performance and compatibility. > > Why do you think MI will give you 'best performance and compatibility' ? > Why not just hand-code the PCC assembly language ? You are forgetting "and compatibility". MI helps prove my point. You can code low level and still be release and hardware independent. I dont think we have any choice. If your utility or api does not work after an upgrade, than it is probably more trouble than it is worth. Requiring a recompile may be ok, but even that has the potential for customer downtime or worse. -Steve
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.