× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MI400
  3. August 2001

Re: What is the overhead of using system built-in's

  • Subject: Re: What is the overhead of using system built-in's
  • From: "Bob Donovan" <rjd@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 07:43:16 -0500
  • Importance: Normal
 


> What is the overhead of using system built-in's (e.g. in ILE RPG)
> in stead of MI?

There is no overhead.  Calling system built-ins directly from RPG is as
efficient as calling them from MI (or C, or CL, or COBOL).  The translator
generates essentially the same code in all cases.

Bob Donovan/Rochester/IBM,   rjd@us.ibm.com


+---
| This is the MI Programmers Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dr2@cssas400.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.