|
From: <thomas@inorbit.com> > Gene: > Was just mildly curious about how changing the module info before binding it into a program would affect save/restore of the program object, whether any security violation would be signalled. > > UPDPGM can already mislead an analyst trying to determine what a program is doing. (See help text for MODULE() parm.) It just seems that it's getting TOO easy to disguise program activity by misdirection. Tom, It was precisely because UPDPGM does not update the library correctly that I originally posed my question. I've developed a program to change any and all information about modules and programs. Typical use of this is promotion of modules from test to production where you need to change library information (and souce library information). +--- | This is the MI Programmers Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dr2@cssas400.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.