RE: Exception message in Joblog

["Richard Jackson" <richardjackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Perhaps you were expecting me to disagree with you?  Not likely!

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-mi400@midrange.com [mailto:owner-mi400@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of Leif Svalgaard
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 8:27 AM
To: MI400@midrange.com
Subject: Re: Exception message in Joblog


From: Richard Jackson <richardjackson@richardjackson.net>
> In my experience,
> putting a monitor in place has never prevent the message from writing to
the
> log

Ah, but Richard, using a compare value of x'00000000' instead of "MCH"
*does* prevents the joblog entry, so I have in a sense answered by own
question. I wanted to see if I had overlooked some trivial detail. Maybe
some of the MI-heavies on this list would know? I got some insightful
clues from Dave.

In another thread on another list there was a discussion about the
"openness" or "closedness" of the AS/400. The question in the present
thread shows how closed the AS/400 really is. Something as fundamental
as handling events and exceptions is shrouded (clouded?) in a deep fog.
sigh


+---
| This is the MI Programmers Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dr2@cssas400.com
+---
+---
| This is the MI Programmers Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dr2@cssas400.com
+---