|
Which OS release are you on? I'll bet you are on V4R2 or earlier. If you are on a release before V4R4, it might be better to upgrade rather than to play with associated spaces. At V4R4, there is a thing called the system-wide statement cache that is way better than SQL packages. I'll bet V4R2 or earlier because 16 megabytes was the old size limit for SQL packages. At V4R3 when it became about 500 megabytes or about 15,000 statements. Are the programs for which you want to reset the associated space SQL packages? If they are SQL packages, just delete them and let SQL recreate them. If they are regular programs containing embedded SQL, then why do they grow? If they are regular programs, it sounds like they are doing something wrong with prepares that causes this growth. In fact, it sounds like they shouldn't be saving the rebuilt access plans at all but I don't know how to stop that. Now that you have decided that none of the comments above apply to your situation, compile two of the programs and look at the size of the associated space. If I recall (and it has been a VERY long time) an RPG program associated space is something like 200 bytes (or two pages - that was really a long time ago) plus the size of the saved SQL statements. Each access plan requires 32k. Work your way backwards until you figure out how big it should be then find the length or offset value near offset zero in the associated space - use dmpsysobj to view the associated space. If you can't find the value for the offset, compile the program and record the size. If you want to reset it later, change it to the size that you recorded. Richard Jackson mailto:richardjackson@richardjackson.net http://www.richardjacksonltd.com Voice: 1 (303) 808-8058 Fax: 1 (303) 663-4325 -----Original Message----- From: owner-mi400@midrange.com [mailto:owner-mi400@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Chris.2.Roberts@sb.com Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 12:45 PM To: MI400@midrange.com Subject: Resetting the Associated Space of an SQL program I'm currently experiencing problems on my systems that have been identified and fixed by APAR 89097: After putting on SF99104 version 8, BPICS applications slowed down. STRDBG UPDPROD(*YES) showed msgCPI4323 RC1 subtype x/800C F/QQQVAP PROC/QQQSNDPMSG T/QSQOPEN PROC/FULL_OPEN. For every CPI4323 there was a msgSQL7917 F/QSQOPEN PROC/FIXPGM T/QSQOPEN PROC/OPQRYDBM. Using DSPOBJD on bpics_program_names to find program size showed that many programs were over 16 million bytes. There was no room to store the rebuilt access plan. Recompiling the programs reduced the program size and performance returned to acceptable levels. Unfortunately, the programs filled back up with hours. SF60758 (in Database Group PTF SF99104 version 8) added a code path that changed how SQ component handled access plan sizes. This change caused the program to reach it's limit. This caused the performance degradation due to the system having to handle SQL7917 for every CPI4323. Once the fixing PTF is applied, users will need to recompile their programs to reduce their size. Removing SF60758 is not recommended. For the majority of the programs, I have been able to re-compile the code no problem. For the other programs, I do not have the source and was wondering if there was a way via MI instructions (MODS, etc) to reset the associated space size of a program so that the template and associated space (foregoing valid access plans) would be the same as if I had re-compiled the program? I have tried the following approaches: CHGPGM FRCCRT(*YES) and the folling MI program: #include <QSYSINC/MIH/RSLVSP> #include <QSYSINC/MIH/MODS> #include <STRING.H> void main(int argc, char **argv) { _SYSPTR pgm_ptr; _SPCPTR sp; _SPC_MOD_T mod_t; pgm_ptr = rslvsp(_Program, argv^2], argv^1], _AUTH_OBJ_MGMT); memset(&mod_t, 0, sizeof(_SPC_MOD_T)); /* Clear out the template */ mod_t.Size = (argv^3])?atoi(argv^3]):0; mod_t.Modify_Size = 1; mod_t.Modify_Auto_X = 1; mod_t.Auto_Extend = 1; mods2(pgm_ptr,&mod_t); /* Set space attributes */ } With the MI/C program I get some success when I pass a large enough new space size (less than the existing space size though). Is there also a way to re-initialise the access plan for an SQL object via MI or is that type of question more appropriate for one of the other midrange lists?! If someone has another approach, I'd be grateful to hear it. Thanks Chris. -- Chris Roberts (mailto:Chris.2.Roberts@sb.com). Information Resources Standard Applications, SmithKline Beecham PLC, c/6 SB House, Great West Rd., Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 9BD, UK. Tel: (+44)(0)20 8975-3146, Fax: (+44)(0)20 8975-3188. DISCLAIMER: The views contained herein are those of the author and not of my employer, its subsidiaries or affiliates. +--- | This is the MI Programmers Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dr2@cssas400.com +--- +--- | This is the MI Programmers Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dr2@cssas400.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.