Re: swap QTEMPs

Do you mean it's better if you do not have to modify the target job? If so,
I agree, but I think both methods require the target job to do something to
make its QTEMP available to other jobs, either by modifying the PCO or
setting up a message queue. If I'm wrong, someone (Gary? Leif?) please
correct me!


From: Francesco Scafi <fscafi@tin.it>
> Hi Peter,
> I am sorry for my english, but I intended to say that it was better *not*
> have the target pgm...


> +---
> | This is the MI Programmers Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
dr2@cssas400.com
> +---
>

+---
| This is the MI Programmers Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MI400@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MI400-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MI400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: dr2@cssas400.com
+---