×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I need to create a report of users who are authorized to maintain SM transactions and I'm struggling with how transactions which are visible in PMC can be designated as IM, REP or PMC itself.
Looking at the security area for PMC "Maintain Transactions", I see that IM and REP are listed under "APP", in addition to PMC. We're tailored for immediate update and I'm having a hard time conceptualizing someone entering transactions in an IM batch versus PMC transactions that go to TRDATA and allow for changes. Why have PMC in the first place?
Is it correct to say the only way to change a transaction is through PMC and that the transaction must flow through PMC and not be created from an IM batch? (Assuming of course that you have the PMC app and you're tailored for immediate update).
We have REP, we don't use any of the labor reporting features of PMC and we have quite a few barcode laser scanners.
Bryan Burns
iSeries Specialist
ECHO, Incorporated
Lake Zurich, Illinois
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
