yup...
this is exactly what we are going to do. We have a bunch of trash in the
system now, for various reasons, which will be cleaned up as part of
this process.
Thanks for confirming my thought process, too!
Cheers!
Charley
Charley Simpson, CPIM
Director, Material Planning & Logistics
805-426-3414
www.turboneticsinc.com
*** Please note that the information contained in this message may be
privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or
agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us by replying to the message and
deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Turbonetics, Inc. ***
-----Original Message-----
From: mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Phil Campa
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 2:28 PM
To: MAPICS ERP System Discussion
Subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] FW: EPDM...
Charlie,
Thank you for the details.
You can essentially accomplish the same process with EPDM:
- Do not use revisions and effectivity dates in the item revision file
- Do not use revisions with the BOMs
- Do not use effectivity dates at the Parent level in the BOM
- Use effectivity dates at the component levels within the BOM
This in effect, will give you revision history at the component level
"Charley Simpson"
<csimpson@TURBONETI
CSINC.COM>
To
Sent by: "MAPICS ERP System Discussion"
mapics-l-bounces@mi <mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
drange.com
cc
Subject
07/26/2007 01:57 PM Re: [MAPICS-L] FW: EPDM...
Please respond to
MAPICS ERP System
Discussion
<mapics-l@midrange.
com>
Sure, glad to oblige...
We live in a simple world where revisions are truly that: they are fully
interchangeable, inventory can be co-mingled, etc.; if not, then it is a
new item number. Using date effectivity in the BOM gets us the obvious
calculations, etc.
As such, forcing another item revision record to be created to track
that the revision ID incremented buys us nothing at the end of the day.
Did I mention we don't use Routings...yet.
We are a small company with simple processes and the additional "feed
the monster" time required to keep EPDM in sync and fully updated is
just not value-add...for us.
Some will say that you need to have the rev ID on BOM changes but I
disagree. Properly managed effectivity dates give us all the control
and historical view we need, if it truly is a revision, i.e. fully
interchangeable.
That help?
Charley
Charley Simpson, CPIM
Director, Material Planning & Logistics
805-426-3414
www.turboneticsinc.com
*** Please note that the information contained in this message may be
privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or
agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us by replying to the message and
deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Turbonetics, Inc. ***
-----Original Message-----
From: mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Phil Campa
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 1:42 PM
To: MAPICS ERP System Discussion
Cc: mapics-l-bounces+phil_campa=pall.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx; MAPICS ERP System
Discussion
Subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] FW: EPDM...
Charlie,
I am curious to learn what in EPDM you don't need?
Phil Campa
"Charley Simpson"
<csimpson@TURBONETI
CSINC.COM>
To
Sent by: "MAPICS ERP System Discussion"
mapics-l-bounces+ph <mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
il_campa=pall.com@m
cc
idrange.com
Subject
Re: [MAPICS-L] FW: EPDM...
07/26/2007 01:13 PM
Please respond to
MAPICS ERP System
Discussion
<mapics-l@midrange.
com>
EPDM does provide some excellent tools and when needed work great. For
us, it's a "sledgehammer on a fly" solution...
Charley
Charley Simpson, CPIM
Director, Material Planning & Logistics
805-426-3414
www.turboneticsinc.com
*** Please note that the information contained in this message may be
privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or
agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us by replying to the message and
deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Turbonetics, Inc. ***
-----Original Message-----
From: mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
DaleGindlesperger@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 1:12 PM
To: MAPICS ERP System Discussion
Subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] FW: EPDM...
Good, no EXCELLENT, answer. For us, EPDM added the alternate routings
and
such that really gave us what we needed.
Dale Gindlesperger
IT Manager/Special Projects Leader
Fleetwood Folding Trailers, Inc.
258 Beacon Street
Somerset, PA 15501
"Charley Simpson"
<csimpson@TURBONE
TICSINC.COM>
To
Sent by: "MAPICS ERP System Discussion"
mapics-l-bounces@ <mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
midrange.com
cc
Subject
07/26/2007 04:03 Re: [MAPICS-L] FW: EPDM...
PM
Please respond to
MAPICS ERP System
Discussion
<mapics-l@midrang
e.com>
yeah, I know it sounded a wee bit bizarre, but...
Simply put: EPDM, properly used, FORCES additional steps that for us are
just not necessary and, consequently, not value-add to our processes and
controls.
Charley
Charley Simpson, CPIM
Director, Material Planning & Logistics
805-426-3414
www.turboneticsinc.com
*** Please note that the information contained in this message may be
privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or
agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us by replying to the message and
deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Turbonetics, Inc. ***
-----Original Message-----
From: mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
DaleGindlesperger@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 12:38 PM
To: MAPICS ERP System Discussion
Subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] FW: EPDM...
I was a little horrified that you would want to even CONSIDER that move.
It would be awful to step back from EPDM, although even PDM+ would be
better than nothing........ Out of curiosity, may I ask why that was
being considered?
Dale Gindlesperger
IT Manager/Special Projects Leader
Fleetwood Folding Trailers, Inc.
258 Beacon Street
Somerset, PA 15501
cancel the question....
I forgot that PDM is a dead product and that fixes and improvements will
really only be for EPDM....
you forget these things as you age...
*c*
Charley
Charley Simpson, CPIM
Director, Material Planning & Logistics
805-426-3414
www.turboneticsinc.com <
http://www.turboneticsinc.com/>
From: Charley Simpson
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 11:41 AM
To: 'MAPICS ERP System Discussion'
Subject: EPDM...
R6
Hope everyone is having a good day...
Does anyone know if you can reverse migrate EPDM back to PDM?
Thanks!
Charley
Charley Simpson, CPIM
Director, Material Planning & Logistics
805-426-3414
www.turboneticsinc.com <
http://www.turboneticsinc.com/>
midrange.com
