PPV using standard costing -- MAPICS-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: PPV using standard costing
From: "Lloyd Degnon" <ldegnon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:34:21 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l>
List-help: <mailto:mapics-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: MAPICS ERP System Discussion <mapics-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:mapics-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l>, <mailto:mapics-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l>, <mailto:mapics-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

We are at MAPICS version 6, using IFM, we have been tailored to I032 in
IM to equal 'N'. My question is this, what type of GL interface rules
should be in place for PPV to calculate properly? I am not a finance
guy but been forced to learn more lately than I ever wanted to know
about IFM. Does anyone have any examples to share?

Thanks group,

Lloyd H. Degnon
I.S. Manager
Ampro Computers, Inc.
408.360.4365
www.ampro.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: PPV using standard costing , Bob Tenney

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.