Hi Davis Unwin and Lucas Geheniau:

Thank you both for your replies (copied below).

I set the Quantity On Hand Field to have a Report
Summary Function of "Average."

The results are:

1. For the Item No. Sub-Total, this works fine and
gives the correct Quantity On Hand balance.

2. For the Report Totals, it creates a number for the
Quantity On Hand that is meaningless.  

For now, I am manually correcting this number and I'll
continue to do so until another suggestion comes my
way.  :-)

Al Gershen
Cost Accountant Lead
ECS Composites
3560 Rogue River Hwy
Grants Pass, OR 97527
Tele (541) 476-8871, x272
Fax (541) 474-2479

--- "Unwin, David" <dunwin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Tue, 8
Aug 2006 11:47:02 +0100:

Hi Al,

The only way you can get round this is to use the
Average, Minimum or
Maximum summary function for the on hand column.

Kind regards,


--- Lucas Geheniau <geheniau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
on Mon, 07 Aug 2006 08:32:05 +0200:

Hi Al,

If you want the on hand qty correct in the
subtotals, choose min(or max or 
avg) at the summary functions for that column.

Kind regards


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2021 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.