Subject: RE: Low level codes not in sync

[Kevin Fox <kdfox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Terry,

You are correct.

The theory goes like this.

Let's say that an item has a LLC of 4.  MRP will use this LLC to plan the item 
in the proper order.  So for example, if the LLC for all items is 0 - 7, then 
MRP will start planning on LLC 7.  So LLC 4 will be planned after 7,6, and 5.

Now, let's suppose that a bill change causes the item's LLC to change from LLC 
of 4 to an LLC of 7.  This will result in the item being planned near the 
beginning of the MRP run so as to ensure the higher level items (lower LLC's) 
will see the demand correctly.

One more change, suppose we now delete the item from the LLC 7 level leaving 
only the LLC 4 level.  MAPICS does not change the LLC from 7 to 4.  So again, 
the MRP plan will plan the item near the beginning of the planning run.  

Normally, this does not cause an issue.  However, let's suppose that over the 
course of a few months (or years!) we don't reorganize the file.  What happens 
then?  Well we would end up with many items at level 7 that should not be.  And 
depending upon the higher level relationships (i.e. does the item appear in 
multiple bills at multiple LLC's?)  MRP may not calculate all of the demand 
accurately which can lead to some problems.  

Most of the time this problem will have a symptom... the dreaded "33".  For 
those of you who do not know what the dreaded "33" is, let's just say that as a 
planner it is your worse nightmare.  (BTW what you don't know can hurt you and 
your career!)

Hope that helps.

Kevin Fox
'kdfox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
- - - - - -

Kevin

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't MRP use the low level code to determine the
item planning order so that it will not miss a demand.  So if an item is at the 
wrong low level code, isn't possible the system could not plan an order for an 
item.

Terry Moffitt
Mfg. Engineer
Altek Inc.



-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Fox [mailto:kdfox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 10:19 AM
To: mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Low level codes not in sync


Robert, 

As usual you are correct.  Everyone should take note of this as it has caused 
much
confusion over the past few years.

The LLC is updated during BOM maitenance ONLY if the LLC is at a higher level as
a result of the maintenance that is processed.

There was a problem with the Green Screen program having the incorrect LLC which
was fixed on SH71748 (R6 PTF 6365, R7 PTF2919

Kevin Fox
"kdfox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" 



I don't know what you mean about deleting components. If you are refering to 
using
a component at level 4 in one bill and level 7 in another bill and then later 
deleting
the level 7 component.  If my memory serves me right, BoM maintenance never 
reduced
the low level code only increased it.
 
Robert Russell
Paragon SI

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Chris Neely [mailto:Chris.Neely@xxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Thu 12/16/2004 4:10 PM 
        To: MAPICS ERP System Discussion 
        Cc: 
        Subject: Re: Low level codes not in sync
        
        

        I am running EPDM however.
        
        
        
        
        Kevin Fox <kdfox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
        Sent by: mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
        12/16/2004 01:36 PM
        Please respond to MAPICS ERP System Discussion
        
        
                To:     mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
                cc:
                Subject:        Low level codes not in sync
        
        
        The number one reason that low level codes get out of sync is non-MAPICS
        methods of changing data in the product strucure and / or costing.
        
        Check to make certain you do not have any non-MAPICS programs updating
        product structures. (i.e. someone with client access and MS Access
        Database)
        
        You should run in dedicated mode because a reorg can effect other
        sub-systems besides product structures.  ie. IM files, MO files, MRP
        files, MPSP files, etc.)
        
        I monitor these files at least once a month.  If they are out of sync, I
        try to determine the cause.
        
        Also note:  just deleting componenets from bills of material can cause 
the
        low level codes to be out of sync.  If your running the latest code, 
this
        has been corrected in a PDF that the unattached job uses to keep the 
files
        in sync.
        
        Kevin Fox