|
Since you already have PDM+ you are already aware of the challenges associated with change, and that most time saving expectations will be delayed as the learning curve can be long for many. IT can assist by spending time with users to determine the best way information should be presented, this includes creating views & subsets geared to make a department more efficient. I mention department for two reasons, part of our success in going from green to gui was that we chose to migrate by department and firmly establish a gui based process for their needs, and that definitions (view, subsets, templates) should not be viewed as 'one size fits all'. Out of the 30+ people using Browser, only about 2-3 can manage their own views and such. That ratio actually exceeded my expectations, but was nonetheless the impetus for our approach. Also, we don't use EPDM, so we can balance gui & green very nicely, not because we want to, but due to the limitations of Browser encompassing the full MAPICS DB we need to. We could not use Browser with any success without Integrator. This was critical in combining/linking subsystems to facilitate the flow of information. In turn we could not fully use Integrator successfully without ASNA's AVR tool to allow us to create worthwhile API's to really get the full benefit. (We use it to manage the data passed from Integrator to Word, Email, drawing retrieval, etc.) There is much value in Browser, just make sure you can separate comments about benefits/caveats from user's other gui installs such as CSM, EPDM, INTEGRATOR, and OBPM as often their situations relate specifically to those applications and not really Browser. We have typical core apps similar to you, except we don't have IFM, but we do have CSM. We are R6. Overall it has been a positive transition, and the benefits are real. But I also know the success was directly linked to having a support person in IT that knew the product and could demonstrate easily to users how it can really speed up their enquiries by linking information as opposed to using 13 group job screens and writing down numbers just to enter them in another screen. That IT person was core to our success and it wasn't me! Feel free to contact me directly if you desire more specific information. Regards.....james "Walter, Regina" <RWalter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: mapics-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 03/02/2004 08:17 AM Please respond to MAPICS ERP System Discussion <mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To "'mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx'" <mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject Mapics Browser We are currently using Mapics XA6 modules COM, PUR, IM, PDM, PDM+, CRP, PCC, MRP, and IFM. We are considering purchasing the Mapics Browser but would like information about its functionality, productivity gains, support issues, etc. that does not come from a Mapics affiliate's sales pitch. We're particularly interested in pros and cons of using it over COM. Please let me know what you think of the product and over which modules you are using it. I am also interested in lessons learned on the installation, training, and maintenance of the Browser. Thanks, Regina Walter Senior Programmer/Analyst _______________________________________________ This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.