× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



To the list,
I figured out why I could not find EKCNNB.  According to two different 
customer's databases R6, the Retrieval Index has 12 more fields than the Update 
Index.  Am I the only one that tries to use the "Update Index" if updating and 
the "Retrieval Index" for retrieval.  
I cannot believe that this is the first time I noticed this.  Below are the 
fields that are missing from the update index:

EKCKVA, EKCLVA, EKCMVA, EKCNVA, EKCOVA, EKCJNB, EKCKNB, EKCUVA, EKCVVA, EKCLNB, 
EKCMNB and EKCNNB.

Thanks to all that answered...

Eric

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.