|
To the list, I figured out why I could not find EKCNNB. According to two different customer's databases R6, the Retrieval Index has 12 more fields than the Update Index. Am I the only one that tries to use the "Update Index" if updating and the "Retrieval Index" for retrieval. I cannot believe that this is the first time I noticed this. Below are the fields that are missing from the update index: EKCKVA, EKCLVA, EKCMVA, EKCNVA, EKCOVA, EKCJNB, EKCKNB, EKCUVA, EKCVVA, EKCLNB, EKCMNB and EKCNNB. Thanks to all that answered... Eric
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.