RE: Payroll

["Walker, Dale" <DWalker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ted,

This very debate has most likely occurred in each of our companies at
one time or another.  Here are excerpts from our last debate on this
issue; 

The "easiest" way to get labor costs charged correctly to WIP (your
MO's) is to just let the system do it normally through transaction
reporting through PCC.  If you are capturing the transactions in PCC and
are posting times to MOs, running transactions through payroll in order
to get payroll distribution in GL, then all you need to do differently
for an ADP implementation is to not print the Mapics PR checks.  Under
this scenario, what is the ROI?

Dale Walker
Gross-Given Mfg / Automatic Products Intn'l

  



-----Original Message-----
From: Hendricks, Ted [mailto:Ted.Hendricks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 7:21 PM
To: 'MAPICS ERP System Discussion'
Subject: Payroll

Hello.

We recently began using ADP for Payroll.  We work like to do the minimul
amount of work necessary to get costs to the MO's.  We would also like
to
capture costs for temporary employees.  We think that we can do this by
just
processing employees time related to MO's via payroll [to PCC].  

Has anyone crossed this bridge before?  A number of years ago, we used
to
export a file to ADP (we left ADP and returned because of a few
different
owners), but that will not work for us this time because there are other
corporate issues we don't want to have to deal with with mapics.

Any suggestions will be appreciated.

Thanks

Ted Hendricks
Systems Analyst
Fluke Biomedical Corporation
_______________________________________________
This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MAPICS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mapics-l
or email: MAPICS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.