Re: Deleting a COM order

To the list,

FYI, if anyone wants to sample code of how easy it was to (modify) COM Order
delete to be secured let me know.  I only had to add 10 lines of code after
the User Exit UMBMSC6R.  The user exit verify if the User was authorized to
a new Data Security Group that is now described as Class: CO, Group 8888,
Description COM Order Delete.

User exit passes back the error message AMB4202 that states "User not
authorized to" and I append "Delete Orders" to that message.  How easy is
that?

Thanks for your help Nato?

Eric
----- Original Message -----
From: <nathan.quinones@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Eric A. Wolf" <eric_a_wolf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: Deleting a COM order


>
> I think the program you want modify is AMBB4XFR.
>
> This is from the source of program UMBMSC6R:
> *================================================================
> * Program notes:
> *================================================================
> * This user exit will be called from an external program AMBB4XFR
> * which deletes an order and all of its supporting file.
> * Within AMBB4XFR the user exit will be executed prior to any delet
> * taking place, all order records will still be available to the us
> * AMBB4XFR is called from the following programs:
> *          AMBDDPVR   PMT:Confirm Delete Order
> *          AMBD1XFR   EXT:Invoice driver
> *          AMBE0DFR   DSP:Quote review 1 cust
> *          AMBFADFR   DSP:Quote review all cust
> *          AMBFMDFR   DSP:Order copy:all cust
> *          AMBFTDFR   DSP:Order copy:one cust
> *          AMBI6XFR   EXT:Copy offline>Live
> *================================================================
>
> Nathan Quinones
> Custom Systems Corp
> 973-726-0202 x213
> http://www.cussys.com
>
>
> |---------+---------------------------->
> |         |           "Eric A. Wolf"   |
> |         |           <eric_a_wolf@xxxx|
> |         |           ail.com>         |
> |         |                            |
> |         |           03/17/2003 02:08 |
> |         |           PM               |
> |         |                            |
> |---------+---------------------------->
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------|
>   |
|
>   |       To:       <nathan.quinones@xxxxxxxxxx>
|
>   |       cc:
|
>   |       Subject:  Re: Deleting a COM order
|
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------|
>
>
>
>
> Which program calls that user Exit?  That's the one I want to modify.
>
> Eric
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <nathan.quinones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Eric A. Wolf" <eric_a_wolf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 10:14 AM
> Subject: Re: Deleting a COM order
>
>
> >
> > User exit UMBMSC6R is the one called before the delete happens.  In that
> > program, there is a 7 position return code (std COM).  I tried to load a
> > message number into the return code to see if it would prevent the
update
> > but it didn't.
> >
> > Nathan Quinones
> > Custom Systems Corp
> > 973-726-0202 x213
> > http://www.cussys.com
> >
> >
> > |---------+---------------------------->
> > |         |           "Eric A. Wolf"   |
> > |         |           <eric_a_wolf@xxxx|
> > |         |           ail.com>         |
> > |         |                            |
> > |         |           03/17/2003 01:08 |
> > |         |           PM               |
> > |         |                            |
> > |---------+---------------------------->
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> ---------------------------------------------------|
> >   |
> |
> >   |       To:       <nathan.quinones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> |
> >   |       cc:
> |
> >   |       Subject:  Deleting a COM order
> |
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> ---------------------------------------------------|
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Nathan,
> > Which program were you looking at when you were testing the ability of
> > using the return field to control the delete?
> >
> > Eric
> >
>