|
Konrad, You probably won't believe this, but the substitution situation isn't an issue here, for two reasons. 1. When we set up an item with a substitution, we ALWAYS want it substituted. Due to that, I have a nightly "blaster" program that goes through the item substitution file (MBDMCPP), and changes the item description for all items that are subbed from to read "OBSOLETE - USE 1234-4321" (where 1234-4321 is the replacement part number). When our CSRs using CSM see that item description, they just immediately add the replacement item, then delete the old one. They tell the customer on the phone that the old number is obsolete, and it's being replaced by the new number. The correct price and availability (such as it is) is then ready for the new item. 2. If for some reason the CSR doesn't do this, our end-of-order user exit automatically will delete the old number, add the new number, and include an item comment "Item substituted for (old number)". Why do we do this? COM_Net. When one of my customers enters an order through COM_Net, they get the "OBSOLETE" item description, but some of them aren't smart enough to change the item number. That means the shipping department had to do order maintenance to delete the old number and add the new one. To prevent that, we just wrote code into the end-of-order user exit to automatically sub if it finds one. I know that doesn't fit most people's methodology of substitutions, but unlike a lot of companies, we don't offer "possible alternative parts". You have to take the correct part. This is mostly due to how our product is designed and produced - we build at least 90% of the components from raw materials, and the remaining purchased parts must be the absolutely correct part or the unit probably won't work. Just for curiousity, I did look to see if CSM offers substitution checking, and I couldn't find it. Doesn't mean it's not there, but I couldn't see anyplace fairly obvious. It may be one of those "not there yet" pieces, like Kit Processing was. Dale @ Fleetwood Konrad Underkofler <kdunderk@hoshizaki.com> Sent by: mapics-l-bounces@midrange.com 01/16/2003 11:40 AM Please respond to MAPICS ERP System Discussion To: "'MAPICS ERP System Discussion'" <mapics-l@midrange.com> cc: Subject: RE: CSM Opportunities Dale, Looks like we are toast on the Vertex interface but... How does CSM handle substitutes? We handle that as well through a green screen popup offering to substitute then dragging it back to the order to check availability on the substitute. Any solution there? I agree by the way on the 270 performance. We upgraded to the full two processor version and had our interactive response time drop to .1 second and cpu utilization drop into the 1 to 2 % range from the prior 100%. In good news though, EPDM and COM still have issues, if they ever worked well I am not sure what we would have to bitch about... Thanks Konrad -----Original Message----- From: DaleGindlesperger@fft-inc.com [mailto:DaleGindlesperger@fft-inc.com] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:51 AM To: MAPICS ERP System Discussion Subject: RE: CSM Opportunities Konrad, Available to promise isn't an issue for us. We have a ship complete within 24 hours rate of over 98%, except for special order items (our sales part forecaster is pretty good!), and we turn most shortages around in under a week. However, I do understand your concern - CSM sure doesn't seem to check that out, and it would be good if it could. As a suggestion, what we do here for some items that we have outsourced is that at the end of order user exit, the program checks availability and automatically places orders with the vendor for items needed. We also automatically add a comment to the item on the order that says the item is a "Non-stock item - will ship within 10 days". That works for us, but I do agree, while on the phone the customer may be expecting it immediately, which isn't cool. As I said, it hasn't been a significant issue for us, but it could be for a lot of other companies..... Dale @ Fleetwood Konrad Underkofler <kdunderk@hoshizaki.com> Sent by: mapics-l-bounces@midrange.com 01/16/2003 08:23 AM Please respond to MAPICS ERP System Discussion To: "'MAPICS ERP System Discussion'" <mapics-l@midrange.com> cc: Subject: RE: CSM Opportunities Dale, How do you do available to promise or let the customer know what is on hand? CSM just seems to accept any date and any quantity regardless of the user setup for availability check. It would be real easy to acknowledge and commit to an order quantity that we could never ship or override other customers reqirements. Thanks Konrad -----Original Message----- From: DaleGindlesperger@fft-inc.com [mailto:DaleGindlesperger@fft-inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:13 PM To: MAPICS ERP System Discussion Subject: Re: CSM Opportunities Konrad, We are using CSM for order entry and maintenance. It's working fine for us, especially after we upgraded our iSeries from a 720 to a 270 server model, BUT we are not using Pick-Pack-and-Ship. We use the Offline Shipping Enhancement. We are using CSM user exits, but only for order entry. I am under the undertanding that the user exits aren't executed in the middle of processing, only after you hit the "update" or "post" or "create" buttons. That required that we change how we process the orders somewhat, (we also used UMBCOD1R and such to get information in mid-order entry in green screen processing) but we had already developed most of the logic to handle COM_Net orders, which are also posted in a "batch" type mode, loaded through off-line entry. CSM uses the user exits, but the logic must be changed to handle batch mode - no screen handling is available. I have no idea if you can get external code to execute to retrieve information for the screens. This sounds like a good question for Paragon SI. Dale Gindlesperger IT Manager Fleetwood Folding Trailers, Inc. Konrad Underkofler <kdunderk@hoshizaki.com> Sent by: mapics-l-bounces@midrange.com 01/15/2003 02:40 PM Please respond to MAPICS ERP System Discussion To: "'Mapics-L (E-mail)" <mapics-l@midrange.com> cc: Subject: CSM Opportunities Anyone from the user base using CSM to do much other than inquiry? None of the shipment logic seems in place from availability to promise on down (or up) depending on your view. And...user exits. We have the Vertex add on, when entering an order green screen the select a geocode screen pops up. The same user exit runs under CSM but gets a device not found error when it tries to acquire the correct geocode. How is it possible to ask for and receive info out of the COM user exits under the client architecture? Thanks! Konrad Underkofler Director of IT Hoshizaki America, Inc. _______________________________________________ This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mapics-l or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l. _______________________________________________ This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mapics-l or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l. _______________________________________________ This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mapics-l or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l. _______________________________________________ This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mapics-l or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l. _______________________________________________ This is the MAPICS ERP System Discussion (MAPICS-L) mailing list To post a message email: MAPICS-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mapics-l or email: MAPICS-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mapics-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.