|
Joan, et al We are concerned about the Engineering Drawing (we store the revision) number appearing on the P.O. for QS9000 procedures. By using a second item number ("machining"), this is not possible except to manually key it in the extended description, which is error prone. Is anyone handling Outside Processing, using the "real" item number with an operation no? or any other solution that prevents doubling the on order and receipt quanitities, etc. yet preserves the item number integrity? PS: Obviously, we do NOT have EPDM. Philip R. Freimann Director of Information Technology Crane Technologies Group (386) 252-1151, ext. 1,4282 mailto:PFreimann@CraneCams.com -----Original Message----- From: McCready, Joan [mailto:Joan.McCready@metaltekint.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 8:58 AM To: 'mapics-l@midrange.com' Subject: RE: Can Outside Processing be tracked in Mapics? PS It goes without saying (I hope) that you issue the PO for the service being performed, not for the finished (or WIP) end item. I.e. we issue the PO for "machining," not for the item being machined. We put what item is being sent (item # and brief description) in the PO extended description fields, and the MO number and operation in the appropriate PO line item fields... Joan McCready, IS Manager phone: 636-479-4499 MetalTek International fax: 636-479-3399 The Carondelet Division www.metaltekint.com 8600 Commercial Blvd Pevely, MO 63070
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.